semester_4_-_de200
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| semester_4_-_de200 [2020/11/16 02:15] – [Week 3 - Are you with us or against us? Group processes and decision making] admin | semester_4_-_de200 [2025/10/04 17:31] (current) – removed admin | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | ====== DE200 ====== | ||
| - | |||
| - | ===== Week 1 - Welcome to DE200: getting started ===== | ||
| - | |||
| - | Areas of Psychology | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | {{: | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | **Empathy**: | ||
| - | Empathy allows us to engage in moral reasoning about what is right and wrong, and to know when and why to perform prosocial behaviours such as helping. More broadly, it also allows us to anticipate the behaviours of other people in everyday situations and to react appropriately. | ||
| - | |||
| - | * **social psychology perspective on empathy**: in-group / out-group | ||
| - | * **cognitive psychology perspective on empathy**: sharing " | ||
| - | * **biological psychology perspective on empathy**: The focus here is mainly on the neurological and physiological processes through which our thoughts, feelings and behaviours are shaped and, in turn, how those thoughts, feelings and behaviours shape how we respond at a biological level. Tt tends to emphasise theoretical explanations that can account for the development of basic features of the brain, body and nervous system. It thus makes greater use of evolutionary explanations and cross-species comparisons than other areas of psychology. | ||
| - | * **developmental psychology perspective on empathy**: In its focus on cognitive and emotional changes that occur during infancy, but nowdays encompass developmental trajectories across the entire lifespan, from cradle to grave. | ||
| - | |||
| - | **Integrative approach**: using all approaches | ||
| - | |||
| - | **Empathy** | ||
| - | |||
| - | ===== Week 2 - Why do good people do bad things? How to ask and answer different kinds of questions===== | ||
| - | |||
| - | **Compliance**: | ||
| - | |||
| - | **Conformity**: | ||
| - | |||
| - | **Obedience**: | ||
| - | |||
| - | **Informational influence**: | ||
| - | |||
| - | **Individualistic bias**: The tendency to either explain social phenomena in terms of individual psychological processes (explanatory individualism), | ||
| - | individualism). | ||
| - | |||
| - | **Rhetorical psychology**: | ||
| - | |||
| - | * Zimardo' | ||
| - | |||
| - | * **Social identity theory**: A theory of intergroup relations, with specific focus on exploring how members of disadvantaged groups can work collectively to overcome illegitimate inequality. | ||
| - | |||
| - | ===== Week 3 - Are you with us or against us? Group processes and decision making ===== | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | **Social comparison theory**: A theory that suggests we compare our abilities and opinions to those of other people in order to make sense of how to behave in the world: | ||
| - | |||
| - | * we attempt to change ourselves to fit in with our reference group | ||
| - | * we attempt to convince the reference group to change to fit with us | ||
| - | * we disassociate ourselves from that group and maybe even disparage it. | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | **Anonymity**: | ||
| - | |||
| - | **Contagion**: | ||
| - | |||
| - | **Suggestibility**: | ||
| - | |||
| - | **Self-categorisation**: | ||
| - | |||
| - | **Intergroup processes**: | ||
| - | **Intragroup processes**: | ||
| - | |||
| - | **Bales' | ||
| - | * Social-emotional area: positive reactions | ||
| - | * Task area: attempted answers | ||
| - | * Task area: questions | ||
| - | * Social-emotional area: negative reactions | ||
| - | |||
| - | **Tuckman and Jensen’s stage model of group development** | ||
| - | * forming | ||
| - | * storming | ||
| - | * norming | ||
| - | * performing | ||
| - | * adjourning | ||
| - | |||
| - | |||
| - | **Group cohesiveness**: | ||
| - | **Entitativity**: | ||
| - | |||
| - | **Social facilitation**: | ||
| - | |||
| - | **Social loafing**: The tendency of individuals to make less of an effort when they are working collectively with others than when they are on their own. | ||
| - | |||
| - | **Meta-analysis**: | ||
| - | |||
| - | **Collective effort model**: This model suggests that working as a group reduces motivation because participants realise that their individual contributions cannot be evaluated on an individual basis. | ||
| - | |||
| - | **Group polarisation**: | ||
| - | |||
| - | **Persuasive arguments theory**: An informational approach to social influences, it describes the process by which | ||
| - | arguments are drawn into and used in decision making. | ||
| - | |||
| - | * Social comparison theory is most applicable in situations where there is little opportunity for argument but information is available on how others behave and on the socially preferred way of behaving. An example of this would be gambling. | ||
| - | * Persuasive arguments theory is most applicable when the group has more scope for argument, which can be controlled in an experimental context. | ||
| - | * Self-categorisation theory seems to apply when individuals are identified with a specific group. Thus, it would be unlikely to apply in a situation where there was no obvious out-group. A possible example of this might be a jury. | ||
| - | |||
| - | **Groupthink**: | ||
| - | |||
| - | * be impartial – don’t endorse any specific position | ||
| - | * assign a devil’s advocate, thus encouraging critical evaluation | ||
| - | * sub-divide the group occasionally then reunite it to air differences | ||
| - | * consult outside experts or colleagues | ||
| - | * call a ‘second-chance’ meeting before implementing decisions | ||
| - | |||
semester_4_-_de200.1605492949.txt.gz · Last modified: by admin
